the
originality protection
so much he is very willing to accept the rule of law over the weekend, Because he is from Gao Lu to plagiarism own art thinking thoughts troubled him, he admitted to himself
said Yang Yusheng, including copyright law, including the relevant legal system, and indeed also with the practical needs of the gap. Effectively to prevent and control corruption, integrity and moral guidance of the need to strengthen the rule of law efforts. For example, intellectual property concepts deeply rooted firmly academic rights in the end. From existing case, the court in accepting and hearing cases related to plagiarism, there is a very serious miscarriages of justice.
: Rule of law over the weekend
this exhibition, Gao Lu said he did not site exhibitors, and just hung up the name of a curator.
found their own ideas to be copied, he has not questioned Gao Lu Xiangdong said, to breath for him. Since then, we lost contact with the former in the article, he would occasionally mention my name, after which he refuses to talk about
Gao Lu continues to believe that this interaction with Liu Xiangdong general could not be ordinary, I had to work very frustrated, Fan Dian, take me to the South relax.
Gao Lu reporter to clarify, the Organization of Spanish exhibition, he is to interpret this theoretical approach and the word
the end of the 1980s, Gao Lu had some time to come down, came to Quanzhou, I served,
psychological than Xiangdong lawsuit uneasy, Gao Lu calm, although his wife in order to matter looking Liu Xiangdong theory, but that he had stopped,
Han-Dong Wu said that copyright law in the protection of copyright at the same time, the appropriate limit, reasonable use system of copyright. The need for creation, after the creation of works of reference to the creation of earlier works, but the reference to be reasonable, appropriate and lawful. Reference to the number of other people’s writings to the right, but also to indicate the source, indicating that the original author’s identity.
from 2008 to 2010, Liu Xiangdong with the art circles of friends mentioned the matter, hope to convey to Lu Gao.
Yuan, also believes that the lack of domestic academic standardized system of training and education, not in order to develop a sense of the norms of the academic staff, and specialized academic norms courses in the United States. Xue Yong issued a document,
and Gao Lu dialogue Gao Lu Modern and Contemporary Art Research Center, the implementation phase, accompanied by his students on Prediction and Wall Art Museum curator Ji Pengcheng, they are Lu lawsuit agents. They said that consultation with a professional lawyer,
copyright law, the similarity of ideas to be considered plagiarism it?
in an interview at the end, Gao Lu also told reporters reflect on their own, p> According to Liu Xiangdong recalls, he and Gao Lu first met in 1988, modern art seminar held in Huangshan.
Shandong Pictorial Publishing House, senior editor of art books, limited editing knowledge, it is impossible unavoidably review.
In a few days before the press interview, the Liu Xiangdong, a reporter called three times in 2300 at two o’clock. over days of blue.
Harbin Engineering University Press, the Gao Lu’s book is a normal publishing activities. And of the contract provision is Liu Xiangdong the thoughts and opinions and does not form the text, the evidence is just the number of entries copied, such as ‘relationship’, ‘sports’, these are public vocabulary burberry outlet, not his original.
magazine in 2009, recalled ’1985 New Wave’ reports mentioned in the article ‘Shuqin will be called the
past academic fraud case suspected of plagiarism, Liu Xiangdong selected cases to resort to the law, let the judicial process to be judged.
Liu Xiangdong not only sued Gao Lu, asking them to stop the infringement and an apology, also called the intended to send — century thinking
?
sued
Liu Xiangdong remember the district for a walk in the light Maca Park (Gao Lu home in Beijing) to accompany Gao Lu, to help him jet lag, discussed with him the academic secrets like Talked about half,
artist Yin Shuangxi had never heard of.
At the same time, Huaqiao University, College of Liberal Arts teacher Liu Xiangdong copyright infringement lawsuit against a well-known art critic and curator Gao Lu as of July 6, 2010, the case into the judicial process has been accumulated held two sessions.
Gao Lu Zhiliang early 2010 also went to Quanzhou, Liu Xiangdong reception. The same booth as snacks. Looked at the time and Gao Lu place to eat and chat, and then look at the relationship of the two, Liu Xiangdong filled with emotion.
intensification of conflicts aware of
and Gao Lu This is very good friends, I am 46 years old, he was 61 years old, he was older.
students
Liu Xiangdong after at full speed to do two things:
reporters call the art circles some people to understand their duo, and a lawsuit for Liu Xiangdong Gao Lu. Peking University professor Zhu Qingsheng acknowledge receipt of Liu Xiangdong mass to the industry, the message (the message that Gao Lu copying their own ideas), but his direct skip did not see. The former good relations the two people now, very unexpected. Liu Xiangdong the ‘deep understanding’ means to send on the ‘like like’ ‘and Gao Lu inconvenience evaluation
back in 2006, Liu Xiangdong on almost sued Gao Lu,
In 2008, Liu Xiangdong do the exhibition, I know the existence of the word ‘like like’ ‘, specifically what, I do not know
Guangxi Normal University Press, said Liu Xiangdong did not provide a paragraph similar to the comparison table, only two books of the three articles and Gao Lu, rather than ideological. Liu Xiangdong, similar.
University School of Law Teachers also believe that if the same ideology, the expression of different, generally do not constitute infringement, which is academic ethics and norms, copyright law is difficult to adjust.
the responsibility of the publishing house, Han-Dong Wu said, the general of
after the end of 2007, found Liu Xiangdong Gao Lu exhibition in Spain, the name of Gao Lu in May 2009, Guangxi Normal University Press published in the Italian camp theory I ‘like like’ the ‘fully close.
appreciate each other
Liu Xiangdong is engaged in painting, Gao Lu is to carry out the theory. Two of the field is not the same, but Liu Xiangdong said:
and intimate that he was not laid to rest.
Fang claimed every year crackdown about 100 cases, p>
China University of Political Science Professor Yang Yusheng to the mechanisms and realistic academic criticism, the lack of well-established academic discipline mechanism.
Liu Xiangdong report Gao Lu plagiarism case, are not the authority of the final nail. Leaving aside the fact that is reflected in academic circles phenomena and problems thought-provoking.
Liu Xiangdong Gao Lu plagiarism mean in 2007. Liu Xiangdong invited to Beijing to help Gao Lu compiled a book, Gao Lu because of a bad heart was delayed returning from the United States established the flight.
high and old enjoy the Xiangdong not in cahoots with the market-oriented artists to adhere to the spirit.
In recent years, academic fraud case after another. Wang Hui, Professor of Tsinghua University, College of Humanities, Department of History, Professor Zhu Xueqin of Shanghai University doctoral dissertation accused of suspected plagiarism;
this year, a famous scholar Wang Hui and Zhu Xueqin doctoral thesis alleged plagiarism incident, the parties Wang Hui and Zhu Xueqin chose a different way to respond. Wang Hui, preferred to remain silent, but his friend, Columbia University Chair Professor Liu He, traction 80 well-known international scholars published an open letter to the President of Tsinghua University, behind Wang Hui, Wang Hui’s writings guarantees no phenomenon
publisher response
Gao Lu, wearing a framework of thick glasses, a typical scholarly. Can not cover the Baifa Zhao shows the vicissitudes of the ring. Although he talked about Liu Xiangdong and case some frustration, disappointment and anger, the overall feeling was less than panic.
really rich,
on the scene for a walk in the light Maca Park, the Gao Lu denied. The Xiangdong text records in the blog using the contact mentioned ‘Very much’ the ‘is’ means’ core philosophy of the camp, indicating that he was aware of my thoughts earlier
Yuan really rich to inform you two different types of phenomena to be clear, plagiarism can take the legal channels, academic misconduct can require schools and other educational institutions to initiate the review procedures to deal with. Academic misconduct to go the judicial process is difficult and has not yet seen one case of judicial cases of academic misconduct.
Gao Lu memories, written to Liu Xiangdong sequence after him. In the book he edited
summer to build three introduced in the West definition of plagiarism from the integrity of the academic or professional community norms, rather than from the statute or case law. How regulation In a plagiarism lawsuit, the U.S. Court’s review focused on the program is justified, never not be the first to review plagiarism if there.
Gao Lu said that in the domestic and the United States, he made a first e-mail to the author of the work of exhibitors, to inform them go to Song Wei, where to get. no change in embarrassment. In 2007, Gao Lu is also a hotel near South China Normal University, describes a collector Liu Xiangdong understanding, so that he can do the 2008 exhibition.
Sichuan Academy of Fine Arts, Professor Wang Lin also received e-mail,
the day, Wang Zhiliang recall, that he is not gregarious.
Liu Xiangdong sent to the e-mail Gao Lu, will reply, long or short.
in 1989, Gao Lu in Beijing for the Office of Chinese Modern Art Exhibition After Gao Lu returned to the United States, Liu Xiangdong be informed of their work on the Song Wei Department, so Liu Xiangdong get. After 20 years, work has appeared in the auction. Liu Xiangdong feel very uncomfortable,
copyright protection of expression
Yuan Zhen Fu said, whether the expression of the same text, you can review out. But the similarity of meaning, the review is very difficult. Responsible for their post contract between the author and publishers, not against a third party can not be exempt from Press review obligations. Review obligation is the common duty of care, can not be too demanding.
contradiction clues
theoretical research in terminology will not be protected, whether homemade or academic adopted. In other countries, some titles and the title of the book is protected by copyright, China has not.
Zhongnan University President Han-Dong Wu said that the existing copyright law does not protect ideas and views, protection of the manifestations of the ideas. If the restatement of the ideas of others, need to indicate the source if someone else’s statement intact for its own purposes, is copyright infringement. Reference, to enrich and develop the theoretical point of view of other people, but do not indicate the source, which is academic anomie, may not constitute plagiarism. Academic anomie should be plagiarism a distinction between Yuan really rich,
1998, works push Liu Xiangdong Gao Lu participated in the United States According to Ji Pengcheng high art exhibition specifications, exhibitors and works of Western art can be understanding, and help to improve the visibility of artists.
scholars academic point of view is to rely on self-discipline, moral constraints.
In China, the laws and regulations is not a specification to clearly define The court finds that Plagiarism recognized standards through practical and theoretical circles as Intact and a face-lift of plagiarism are violations. China’s plagiarism in only extreme cases, can not represent the whole of the plagiarism case.
famous educator, said this academic expose, expose and anti-expose event is a good thing, caught. So, a lot of good conduct, politics Qingming. academic cultural sector should be the same. He was very pleased with the opposition faction mutual Jieduan, and feel insecure, and even engaged in research writings in the future to prepare plus careful, is it a great contribution to Chinese culture? / p>
a large number of academic misconduct, whether the phenomenon can be used legal channels to relief?
in 2008, Gao Lu to help Liu Xiangdong curatorial, exhibition, named
in remote Quanzhou, also adhere to engage the spirit of contemporary art.
Beijing Han balance law firm in the summer to build three Similar to some or all of the text to express ideas in a similar range, plagiarism should bear the responsibility of the copyright infringement, need proof of the infringer copied not only the performance of his thoughts, statements and create processing and thinking view text copy, copy.
, according to Liu Xiangdong, he and Gao Lu met Gao Lu in the official organ of the Chinese Artists Association of Fine Arts magazine editor in 1987, young Liu Xiangdong often Contributors to him. For this interaction, Gao Lu said that
uncovered Since the 1990s, the number of SCI papers become the main criteria of the academic achievements of many Chinese research institutions and universities appraisal linked with the job classification, research funding, some universities also use rewards to encourage teachers to express their SCI papers, this over-the pursuit of quantifiable mechanism makes part of literacy is not high, people go to fake a
academic a clear sky
Gao Lu did not see the heavy correspondence exchanges with Liu Xiangdong, more is not generated from their point of view.
Liu Xiangdong prosecution to the court, a mass mail to the people of the art circle, set out the matter, Ji Pengcheng discerned by Zhiliang told Gao Lu said, .
：
